This blog is maintained by freelance journalist Orrin Konheim who has been professionally published in over three dozen publications. Orrin was a kid who watched too much TV growing up but didn't discover the joy of film writing until 2003 when he posted his first IMDB user review and got hooked. Orrin runs adult education zoom courses on how to be published, as well as a film of the month club Support Me on Patreon or Paypal: mrpelican56@yahoo.com; E-mail: okonh0wp@gmail.com.
Saturday, July 29, 2017
The Birdman of Alcatraz (1962) Review
If you make a list of the most memorable biopics in history, very few of them come from before 1970 (The year of "Patton"). Films like "Life of Emile Zola" "Sergeant York" "Day for Night" and even Elia Kazan's "Viva Zapata" feel rather dry despite the efforts of their actors. Perhaps it's the Hollywood code that prevents the juicy dark parts of these characters' lives from coming to the forefront in these narratives. Or perhaps Hollywood felt more comfortable with fictional characters whose lifespans they can depict like the title characters of "Johnny Belinda" or "Goodbye Mr. Chips".
"Birdman of Alcatraz" is a rare exception. It follows the entire adult lifespan of a man and remains faithful to much of his life story so that the emotional effect really feels authentic and packs punch.
The film's subject, Robert Stroud (played by the never disappointing Burt Lancaster), is a lifer at Leavenworth Penitentiary (and later Alcatraz) who transforms from an anti-social rebel to an elder statesman (within the confines of his prison walls) when three birds enter to his cell and his senses of empathy and curiosity are awakened. In caring for his birds, he begins to care and form friendships with those around him and finds a purpose to devote his time. When his birds get sick and the local veterinarian tells him it's a routine epidemic and doesn't offer a solution, he exhaustively researches and finds his own and in publishing his results, he becomes one of the leading ornithologists in the country.
The degree to which Stroud was a spiteful man or simply misunderstood (many inmates described him as psychopathic even in his "reformed" stage) is debatable, but both Burt Lancaster and the author of the film's source material, Tom Gaddis (played by Edmond O'Brien in a somewhat odd fourth-wall-breaking narration), have an affection and admiration for the man and that shines through.
Because the character of Stroud is in every frame of the film and in many of these moments, it's just him and the birds. Similar to films like "Cast Away", "All is Lost", or "Wild" the challenges on the part of Lancaster and director John Frankenheimer to make these quiet passages work are met extraordinarily.
Similarly, Telly Savalas, Karl Malden, Neville Brand, Thelma Ritter, and Betty Field do great work in supporting parts. In particular, Karl Malden makes the case for being one of the most consistently great actors of his generation with this understated role as a straight-laced prison warden is what Robert Stroud's anti-hero persona is defined against. The two share a begrudging respect for each other after spending over half their lives on opposite sides and it's a relationship with a lot of depth.
This is a film that one should see not just because Robert Stroud was a fascinating character but because Frankenheimer and Lancaster bring his story to life so well.
Friday, July 28, 2017
Sporcle Quiz I Made: Most Nominated Actresses for Golden Globe (for movies)
This is another Sporcle quiz I made updated from an old quiz that didn't account for the last five years. When playing, keep in mind:
-This quiz only covers movie nominations
-The Golden Globes were created in 1943 but were highly irregular in terms of categories and the number of nominees in their first couple of decades. Some years, they didn't include any alternative nominees at all.
-Comedy (and in some years musical) is included here, so actresses with great comedic performances to their name might pop up higher.
-Have fun!
Friday, July 21, 2017
Three Edgar Wright Films: Hot Fuzz, Scott Pilgrim vs the World, Baby Driver
To the degree that the separation between comedy and drama
remains relevant (or honest as far as award showology is concerned),
Edgar Wright’s films generally gets placed in the comedy category which might
be giving them short shrift. His genre parodies have a certain lightness to
them when compared to the real thing but to call them laughter-inducing isn’t
an accurate word (unless, of course, you are finding it ha-ha funny on first viewing).
The only problem with shortchanging him is that there are so many other words
to describe the unique appeal of Wright’s unique works: kinetic, visually inventive, comfortable to
genre watchers, and affectionate. And yes, there’s a decent amount of pure
dramatic sediment that drives his stories first.
The two films I’ve seen prior to Baby Driver- Hot Fuzz
(2007) and Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010) - are cacophonies of sound and
action. The former is a buddy cop parody on overdrive. Like a Terry Gilliam
film, the biggest draw is its visual invention. Like a kid playing with the
rewind and forward buttons on a tape recorder (only a thousand times better),
Wright’s affection for his subject is matched, perhaps overshadowed, by his
love for telling a story. Simon Pegg’s arc - a determinator cop who needs to
loosen up a little – hits its emotional notes but it’s more of a soft landing.
Scott Pilgrim is a hybrid adaptation of a comic and a cross-medium
exploration merging conventions of films and video games. Michael Cera plays
the titular character. He’s a bassist in a band and a hopeless romantic and
despite looking and sounding like Michael Cera, he finds relatively
good-looking women willing to date him and is considered hip amongst
his small circle of friends in his small town (did I mention that the film is
set in Toronto, the fourth largest city on the continent!?). Pilgrim finds an
appropriate emo girl of his dreams but things start getting surreal when her
seven exes show up and he must defeat them in videogame combat which is where
the majority of the cool visual trickery comes in.
For some odd reason, everyone in the film is a manic pixie
dream something (whether roommate, bandmate, sibling, standard Aubrey Plaza
character or ex-girlfriend): Everyone in his life is incessantly interested in
the news of his love life without ever having a need to share news of their own
with him. Perhaps if the film is a meta-commentary on how video games are an exercise
in egocentric empowerment, it’s fitting that Scott Pilgrim is at the center of
his own universe. The mythology of this filmic universe is rich with parallels
to video games that add a layer of depth and richness to the story. There’s
also a thru-line of symbolism here about how romantic courtship with a damaged
partner involves a metaphorical fight against their baggage. In short, there’s
a lot of depth here. On top of that, it’s a movie about a guy asking a girl to
love him (or whatever that line from “Notting Hill” is).
Like Wes Anderson and “Grand Budapest Hotel” or Richard
Linklater and “Boyhood”, “Baby Driver” is the kind of film that has the
potential to make Edgar Wright a player in the awards season and cement his
place as an acclaimed director (again, as far as awards matter). Like the band OK
Go’s YouTube career, Edgar Wright’s technical expertise is used for an entirely
different magic trick: In this case, it’s attempting to stage the most
ambitious car chases ever seen without use of green screen. At the same time,
the film is rich with character work: Miles AKA Baby is an original creation
with deep back story and the work by John Hamm, Jamie Foxx, Kevin Spacey and
Lily James builds up the support significantly. More importantly, there’s a
deep emotional component at play with Baby’s newfound love, his good will towards
innocent civilians in dangerous situations, the hole in his life from his late
mom, his care for his foster dad, and his emotional coming-of-age as a man of
moral character. Baby's final surrender isn't just a nice combination of sound and music but something of an emotional meaning.
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
Last Minute Emmy Wish List in the Comedy Categories
Here are some last minute predictions for the Oscars in the comedy categories using only shows I've seen. Seven shows get nominated in the comedy category and in the writing and directing categories the shows generally go to specific episodes. In this case, I listed overall writing and directing and then picked twelve episodes I really liked in hopes of picking them up. On the drama side, I don't really have many hopes except hoping that Bates Motel gets honored and that Aubrey Plaza gets a supporting nod in Legion.
Credit: Deadline.com |
Best Comedy
Good Place
It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
Trial and Error
The Real O’Neals
Lady Dynamite
Schitt’s Creek
Those Who Can’t
BoJack Horseman
Directing
The Good Place
It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
Trial and Error
Dirk Gentley’s Whollistic Detective Agency
I Love Dick
Brockmire
Writing:
Dirk Gentley’s Whollistic Detective Agency
It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
The Good Place
BoJack Horseman
Trial and Error
Brockmire
Lead Actor:
Hank Azaria, Brockmire
Randall Park, Fresh off the Boat
Pete Holmes, Crashing
Eugene Levy, Schitt’s Creek
John Lithgow, Trial and Error
Andy Daly, Review
Lily Tomlin, Grace and Frankie
Maria Bamford, Lady Dynamite
Kathryn Hahn, I Love Dick
Constance Wu, Fresh off the Boat
Kristen Bell, The Good Place
Amanda Peete, Brockmire
Ellie Kemper, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
Supporting Actor:
Danny DeVito, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
Fred Melamed, Lady Dynamite
Sam Waterson, Grace and Frankie
Kevin Bacon, I Love Dick
Tituss Burgess, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
Ted Danson, The Good Place
Supporting Actress:
Martha Plimpton, Real O’Neals
June Diane Raphael, Grace and Frankie
Lauren Lapkus, Crashing
Mary Steenburgen, Last Man on Earth
Jayma Mays, Trial and Error
Catherine O’Hara, Schitt’s Creek
Guest Actor:
Adam Scott as Trevor, The Good Place
Daveed Diggs as Perry, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
Ray Liotta as Paulie Fiuccillo, Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt
Stephen Tobolowsky as Jack Barker, Silicon Valley
Aasif Mandvi as Parshwall, Another Period
John Gemberling as John Hancock, Making History
Guest Actress:
Cheri Oteri as Cattie Goodman, Those Who Can’t
Annie Mumulo as Jill Kwatne-Adelman nee Kwatne, Lady Dynamite
Christine Rose as Josie Davis, Trial and Error
Ramona Young as Allison, The Real O’Neals
June Dianne Raphael as Eleanor Roosevelt, Another Period
Sandy Martin as Mac's mom, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia
Tuesday, July 11, 2017
Orphan Black Season 1 Notes: My Introduction to Clone Club
Credit: BBC America |
I recently started watching Orphan Black and have been racing against time to watch the series in the present by the Season finale. In less than three weeks, I have seen three entire seasons of the show and have taken some notes as I've progressed. I took the liberty here in these notes of annotating based on what I know at the end of the third season.
Pilot:
-Similar to
“Terminator” or one of those fish-out-of-water Hitchcock films (“North by
Northwest” and “39 Steps” are the most famous examples), the pilot cleverly
layers itself with other genres over the hard science-fiction. There’s a stolen
identity charade, a underground crime angle, and a buddy cop dynamic.
-The pilot doesn’t
have a lot of up-front exposition either but that’s because it has a lot of
action. The show gets a lot of mileage out of one hour. Sarah’s status as an
orphan, ward of Mrs. S and mother to a little girl named Kira are not things
that we know automatically and a lot of things are pieced out as we go along.
True, there are some sloppy exposition bombs being dropped, but it’s preferable
to slowing down the pace.
-As for the
exposition on Paul and Art’s storylines, there’s even less time to establish
anything but it’s mostly from the POV of Sarah. Virtually the only character
trait we really know about Sarah is that she’s far less disoriented than she
should be under this situation
-When watching this
on Amazon Prime, you can use the x-ray feature to see when Tatiana Maslany is
playing Beth or Sarah and that’s helpful. It’s almost a cheat sheet
Second Episode:
-I’m kind of tired of artistic people like Felix living in swanky lofts that are clearly designated as storage space and not living space (see “New Girl” or “Friends”)
-I’m kind of tired of artistic people like Felix living in swanky lofts that are clearly designated as storage space and not living space (see “New Girl” or “Friends”)
-If Sarah was this intelligent, studious, and amazing at improvising social interaction, you think she would have been employed somewhere with a high paying job already? I have yet to see a TV character that fits in the overlapping space in the venn diagram of drifter and stoner
-Allison is kind of
a jerk, yes, but she also sticks out because she doesn’t want to volunteer
exposition to Sarah like everyone else.
-The actor who plays
Art is emoting so much, it borders on parody. The science-fiction here is
layered over other genres but very little effort is expended to make Art’s
dialogue not sound like the standardest of standard cop speak.
-I’m also not
particularly cool with Art’s confiscation of Beth’s money. Sure, it moves the
plot along (or rather, keeps it in an amenable holding point) but it’s wrong on
so many levels. If Art is trying to make sure his partner is getting her life
back together, how is s—t not going to hit the fan when Paul finds out that
$70,000 has been stolen from her account.
-It’s taking a while
to get into my head that this show is supposed to be Canadian (the Ontario license
plate is tipping me off). Because of Felix and Sarah’s heavy accents and the
British punk aesthetic, I was confused for a while as to where this was set.
This still leaves questions of how two young adults have not sufficiently been
acculturated enough to the Ontario landscape to adopt the accent.
Third Episode:
-Sweet catharsis: Things
are finally explained! Here’s what I’m most wondering. I’m more or less watching
this in a vacuum, for others guys how much of the clone plot did you know in
advance of this reveal?
-Finally, things get
a little easier for Sarah! This is a show like “Americans” “Prison Break” or “Breaking
Bad” were all kinds of disparate people and organizations are conspiring
against one person in entirely different directions to make their life near
impossible. It’s in Episode three, that the impossible starts to feel possible.
(Ed. Note: Apparently, there’s A LOT more
to learn, I was so young and foolish back then to think I was close to learning
the truth here)
-Where did Allison
come from? She moved her family to Toronto or she was already there?
-I wonder if it
alludes to Sarah’s past life that she is adept at flirting to get what she
wants with men
-With all her
secrets and her mission, why did Beth acquire a live-in boyfriend like Paul?
-Allison strikes me
as one of those annoying uber-moms. “I have kids, I’m important!” is her mantra
(Ed. Note: This later gets majorly
dropped. Allison also clearly has the ability to enjoy and do things for
herself. I dub her in later seasons)
Fourth Episode:
-Sarah: Paul is dead weight. Dump him ASAP. I would even recommend killing him and disposing his body for all that is at stake
-Sarah: Paul is dead weight. Dump him ASAP. I would even recommend killing him and disposing his body for all that is at stake
-Why doesn’t Sarah
just get “Beth” relegated to the desk as fast as possible? Thee less “work” she
has to do the better.
-Helena reminds me
of Paul Bettany in the Da Vinci code (Ed.
Note: apparently, with her religious upbringing there’s a reason for this)
-As someone who did a semester at the University of Minnesota,
the campus does not look like that, but it’s kind of nice to see my sort-of
alma mater referenced in television. Much of the show’s hard-core science comes
through Cosima and there’s something to be appreciated about the prevalence of
a TV character whose dialogue could legitimately be believed as real science as opposed to technobabble
The Rest of Season
1:
On the whole, I think this show and is up there with the best dramas on TV.
It's a situation where the protagonist is dealing with pressures from 8 or 9
disparate parties that are trying to kill, extort, expose or use them in some
other bad way and they have to keep them all at bay with different sets of
lies. “Prison Break”, “The Americans”, some of the serialized storylines in “Burn
Notice”, and “Breaking Bad” are examples of this, but there’s a lot to be said
of how the protagonists are flexible enough to alter their game plan rather than
stick to a mantra of “no, we're never telling anyone anything" and a lot
of the show's turns are about revealing truths to different parties as they go
on and playing some of these parties who are now in-the-know off each other in
strategic ways
In short, it’s a
show that differs in that it’s not about characters trying to define themselves
through deception of society. Rather, the show builds positively among its
characters through openness (sharing of “the big secret”) as time moves on. C
Other Notes:
-I still think Art
isn't played by the best actor, and I’m glad he’s a bit more out of the
picture. At least Angie is more outwardly a jerk to others (and Sarah's line "bite me" was one of the best moments of the season)
-I like the budding
Allison/Felix relationship. Allison is an adequate character, so far, but not
great. I didn't really buy her fall from grace and while she talks about her family
a lot in the beginning, bucan't even remember offhand the names of her adopted children.
-Aynsley's death was
horrible to witness and hard to excuse. It's really just not human natural
instinct if you're not a murderer to let someone die like that. Aynsley never
got dealt a good hand in the events of this show. She kind of reminds me of
those shallow nosy rich suburban housewife archetypes TV generally likes to
diminish to some form of evil but I'd like to think shows like “Desperate
Housewives” tried to play with those misconceptions. In any case, it’s
interesting to note that unlike shows that feel the need to kill off characters
just to keep the suspense going, there’s no such pressure with “Orphan Black”
-My crush on Delphine knows no bounds
-Badly needed: Cosima's origin story. Who are her parents? At what point did she find out she was a clone?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)