This is an article I wrote several years ago for a website called
helium which collects people's articles and pays them just a few cents
for those articles. Not a good deal. This morning I got an e-mail
several years after I wrote this article that my article was deleted
from the database for some odd reason, so I'll gladly share it with you
here.
In the internet age, everyone's attention spans are getting shorter and a
lot is being left out. My sophomore year in college, for example, I had
a roommate who had a few habits that got on my nerves. He would cycle
through his mp3s and never be able to play a single song all the way
through. He would never be able to watch a half hour TV show, instead
perferring highlights on ESPN, clips from Saturday Night Live reruns
(back when they aired on Comedy Central), and MTV videos.
It
frustrated me that he could never sit all the way through a program
without changing the channel. I would listen to entire CDs from start to
finish, watch entire movies, and plays. I would go to class and listen
throughout the entire lecture. How awful it must be to have that small
an attention span, that my poor roomate, has, I thought?
Fast
forward five years later and after discovering the joys of youtube and other
forms of internet video for the past year and a half or so I've turned
into him. This is the tragic thing that youtube has done to me.
With
so many forms of entertainment being available to me every time I log
into a computer, I want to experience them all and can't sit still too
long at any one thing before something else grabs my attention. Why
watch an entire episode of the Conan O'Brien show where you can just see
the clips of the skits since it's on MTV's site? Why listen to the
radio when you can get any song you want on demand? I started taking
those shortcuts toward instant gratification and I'm having trouble
finding my way out. My primary form of entertainment has gone from
two-hour long movies to a one-hour long drama like Heroes to half-hour
shows to clips of Monty Python, Conan O'Brien or Mad TV on youtube and
it's affecting everything I do.
I can't sat still through
lectures and often through work I find myself channeling through
youtube, a TV show on demand, or some other video or radio station site.
I can't watch TV through the commercial breaks and I'm often
alternating between two or more shows. I'm an instant gratification
junkie, in short, and I'm fully aware that's a more chaotic and less
peaceful place that both society and myself have fallen privy to.
How
is this a problem? Well, aside from the obvious answers of all the ways
a shortened attention span makes it more difficult to focus on anything
and get anything done, I feel like we can't fully appreciate anything
at all as well. Remember Beethoven's 5th symphony? Oh, silly me, I
forgot that you folks in generation X won't dare listen to anything
unless it has words being sung/screamed loudly accompanied to a
keyboard, guitar, drums and bass, and you folks in Generation Y, live in
a world where only rappers are considered true musicians, so that's
pretty much synthesizer, drums and bass (see we've already shortened our
attention span from 4 instruments to 3).
Anyway, Beethoven's 5th
symphony is that one that goes Dum-Dum-Dum-Duuuuum,
Dum-Dum-Dum-Duuuuum. It's a very dramatic piece that even my 5-second
attention span college roommate had downloaded on his computer but that
well-known part of Beethoven's 5th Symphony is only the 1st movement of
four parts. If you listen to the 2nd part of the symphony, it's very
boring and insipid on its own, the third is kind of iffy, but the 4th is
where it all comes together. When you get to the fourth, you realize
that the second and third movements were put there for a reason: to
provide contrast to the 2nd and 3rd movements. The symphony takes over
30 minutes to listen to (or maybe it's 20 or 40, I really am just
guessing here, but it's at least 4 times longer than your average song
on the radio, put it that way. I couldn't find on wikipedia, google,
amazon, my desk encyclopedia or this old music textbook how long the
symphony was) which very few people in Generation Y has the patience to
do
but it is that much more rewarding to get to movement 4 . And
that's exactly what we're missing when our attention spans get reduced
to wax: The metaphorical second and third movements of the movie, TV
show, album and quite possibly life itself.
This blog is sporadically maintained by freelance journalist Orrin Konheim (he regularly writes at http://www.patreon.com/okjournalist) who has been professionally published in over three dozen publications. Orrin was a kid who watched too much TV growing up but didn't discover the joy of film writing until 2003 when he posted his first IMDB user review and got hooked. Orrin runs adult education zoom courses on how to be published, as well as a film of the month club
Friday, November 30, 2012
Friday, November 23, 2012
Mindy Project: Thanksgiving Episode Review
I generally don’t care too heavily for the standard romcom
but for two weeks in a row, The Mindy Project has gotten me to feel Mindy’s
pains of a woeful love life. Last week, there was the painful realization that
Mindy’s biological clock was running out. This might not have been so
emotionally painful if not for the way it all played out: A screwball comedy
scenario of Mindy getting an intimate interview from Dr. Castellano segued
rather suddenly into a poignant third act in which Mindy was bedridden with
depression.
This week, I found the same effectiveness in making Mindy’s
rather typical problems carry that extra sting. In this episode, Mindy goes to
Gwen’s Thanksgiving Party in somewhat of a mopey mood because her sports agent
boyfriend (yes, that sleazy guy from the night club) doesn’t want to be
exclusive with her. Her mood temporarily brightens when she bumps into an old
flame only to find out that he’s with someone else.
Mindy’s dilemma of suddenly becoming emotionally
unpredictable upon hearing the news that an ex (Ed Helms) is with someone new
is fairly universal and increasingly more prevalent with the advent of
facebook. In fact, the inability of facebook to make the news of my exes
disappear is my number one complaint with the medium. It is also why I found
myself really rooting for Mindy to snag back the man that got away. After all,
I think it’s fairly well established that Mindy’s current boyfriend really
isn’t a keeper. It is interesting in its own way to have Mindy try to better
herself by dating a sleazy sports agent she doesn’t have a future with but it’s
not particularly meaningful. This is why I’m particularly pleased that the
Josh-Mindy scenes are taking up only two or three minutes an episode.
This is an also an episode of pairings. Morgan comes along
as Mindy’s plus one to Gwen’s Thanksgiving party. This might not make very much
sense, but it’s a good way to get some inter-group chemistry going by isolating
these two. It also helps that Ike Barinholtz is making Morgan fun in every
scene he’s in. It’s been a while since Barinholtz left Mad TV and it’s a good
thing he’s finally finding a meaty comic role to sink his teeth into.
The B-story was fairly lackluster but it sported another
good pairing. Betsy goes home to a family that treats her like a kid and there’s
unresolved tension. Nothing particularly grandiose comedically here but I do
like the Betsy-Jeremy pairing. Because the show is seen through Mindy’s point
of view (I’m referring here to both the showrunner and the character), Jeremy’s
primarily defined through his sexuality.
Therefore, a good way to develop Jeremy is to pair him up with a woman who he has no desire to have sex with. I know that with the way characters are always being paired up, it seems premature to rule out Betsy from Jeremy’s menu, but I’m pretty sure Betsy is meant to be too plain and frumpy to appeal to someone like Jeremy or pretty much anyone. So as a result, we don’t get sexy playboy Jeremy but curious foreigner Jeremy and I’m fine with that.
Last but not least, the C-story features Danny paired with
no one. Watching Danny enjoy Thanksgiving in solitude tugged at my heartstrings
which was pretty much the intended effect. Here’s hoping Danny learns to open
himself more..
Random thoughts:
-Am I only the one who feels like they tried to plug a
dinner party scenario into a Thanksgiving episode? There was little talk of
turkey or football, Morgan would have likely had his own plans, and why would
Mindy feel the need to go with a date?
-Mindy and Gwen have low-to-moderate chemistry as friends.
When they get into a girlfight, however, it’s a whole another story. That was
pretty intense and pretty delightful at that. Anna Camp just earned her place on the show with that scene
-I’m kind of used to thinking of Ed Helms as a bad boyfriend from "The Office" so it was kind of ironic seeing him as a legitimate possibility for Mindy
-Ever notice how characters on TV flirt better than we do in real life? Even with a gun pointed to my head, I don't think I could have come up with as witty responses in conversation as Ed Helms' Dennis in the conversation with Mindy right after he falls down the stairs. Oh yeah, and he just fell down the stairs.
Go On Episode Review: Dinner Takes All
Go On has its moments as a Steven-Carrie-Ryan show and its
moments as a Ryan-and-the-group show but for a number of reasons (logistical,
for one), merging them together usually feels forced. This Thanksgiving-themed
episode was a good case in point of that awkwardness. That Ryan's group members
would ditch their established plans to have Thanksgiving at Ryan's radio
station stretches believability just a little. That Carrie would skip
Thanksgiving with her family to participate in a hair-brained (not to mention,
immature) scheme by her boss, when an entire episode resolved with the pair establishing
such boundaries, stretches believability just a little more AND negates some of
the growth the characters have made to date.
-The New York Times had an infographic on the Fall Season's breakout characters last week and Brett Gelman's Mr K was on there. Am I the only one who finds him somewhat limited? Playing creepy-crazy doesn't take that much effort. I much prefer Julie White as whip-smart curmedgeon Anne.
The main Ryan-centered plot is that Ryan and Steven reunite
with an old friend (Lauren Graham) who Steven begins to crush on. Ryan,
attempting to be a good friend, initially throws his backing behind Steven and
agrees to be his wingman. Cue Act II: Ryan changes his mind and wants Lauren Graham and
while he's not ready to date yet, he doesn't want Steven to have her. Ryan's
long been a bit egotistical and we're supposed to understand that goes with the
territory of being a famous radio personality (and also goes with the territory
of being played by Matthew Perry), but I had a problem with the show's lack of
awareness that this was not a good thing Ryan was doing. Especially since he
shared his plan with the group, and Lauren didn't even step in and say this might be unhealthy.
Still, while the episode's premise was a little shaky, it
wasn't a half hour that was entirely devoid of enjoyment. In terms of character
growth, Steven and Ryan had some good moments together and it's significant progress
that Ryan is ready to start thinking about dating.
The group is also gelling together and those character quirks-Yolanda
suddenly interjecting her loyalty to someone, Lauren awkwardly backtracking
after overstepping her bounds, etc.- are starting to get more comic mileage as
the traits become more recognizably associated with the characters. I especially
liked the shared moment between Owen and Yolanda as they both related to each
other as children of tiger moms who played string instruments (which isn't a
thing, by the way, but I bought that it COULD be a thing in-universe).
The ensemble is easy to enjoy from the perspective that
there's no show on TV where random people are connected by nothing but a common
emotional denominator: loss. There's a certain chemistry between the characters
and a bittersweet tone to the characters that sets this show apart but I could
still use a little more humor. From a comedy standpoint, the show had exactly one scene that worked tremendously: The made-up unique Ryan and Steven engaged in their own unique drinking game. Whether that's enough to overcome a somewhat low joke-per-minute ratio is still up in the air.
Random thoughts:
-Ryan's voiceovers are corny. I'd even rank "Modern
Family" above "Go On" when it comes to schmaltzy voiceovers to
close out the episode
-I've heard the argument that Go On isn't that unique when
you consider "Community" is still on the air and I've heard the
comparisons (Personally, I don't like "Community" anymore but I
digress). It's worth noting that Community stopped being about a group of
involuntary study buddies after the first season. It was then that they
consciously chose to take the same class. It also didn't really matter if they
were taking the same class: The characters also basically just decided to be a
gang. It will be interesting to see how Go On handles this dilemma of voluntary
separation.
-Owen has been a bit oscillating between shy and confident.
-If I'm not mistaken, Lauren Graham is good friends with
Matthew Perry and confessed to having a crush on him on "The Ellen Show". I know
Ellen makes her stars do crazy things, but art imitating life?
-The New York Times had an infographic on the Fall Season's breakout characters last week and Brett Gelman's Mr K was on there. Am I the only one who finds him somewhat limited? Playing creepy-crazy doesn't take that much effort. I much prefer Julie White as whip-smart curmedgeon Anne.
Thursday, November 15, 2012
Some Old-Timey Reviews from 2003 Films
In an effort to update the blog with something, I've decided to fill this space for now with reviews I used to post on the Internet Movie Database that I wrote when I first registered in 2003. They are entirely unchanged from when I wrote these nine years ago, so if you have a problem with their quality and accuracy, take them up with the 2003 version of Orrin. To very loosely quote an episode of Futurama ("loosely" means I'm not going to actually look it up): "I can't be held responsible for what year-ago me said or did. He was a maniac."
This was essentially my first effort to be a critic. I was out of college for a year and seeking to devote myself to something new and keep myself active. It was through doing these that I eventually got interested in being a critic and in film studies when I went back to college, so it all comes full circle:
Bruce Almighty:
Jim Carrey, who has thoroughly explored bathroom humor and Frank Capraesque drama, finds a very comfortable balance here. The plot: Carey is a newsman in Buffalo whose frustrations over his unmet aspirations to be a news anchor cause him to challenge God himself. God, in the form of Morgan Freeman, accepts his challenge setting up a pretty decent opportunity for some laughs. The choice to put Carrey's character in Buffalo rather than the New York City where most movies are set, seems to resonate in a symbolic sense, as the world Carrey inhabits always seems to be a little off the norm. Aside from Carrey's comedy, and a convincing performance by Morgan Freeman (as convincing as humanly possible, that is, considering he's playing God), I liked this movie because at heart it's very uplifting and speaks great truths about the power of love and `being a miracle.'
Daredevil:
Whether it lives up to the success of its Marvel predecessor Spiderman with whom this superhero shares several parallels, Daredevil is an undeniably solid film. The advantage for Daredevil's appeal is that unlike human spiders, blind people actually do exist and his struggles add a neat human dimension. The title sequence is done in Braille and the special effects, shown from our blind superhero's point of view, are amazing. The well-balanced story is somewhat dark in tone but not depressing, and gives us a good character portrait. What's best about the film, however, is its cast. Ben Affleck, with his do-good persona has superhero written all over him. Affleck isn't physically intimidating but that never stopped Tobey MaGuire in Spiderman or Michael Keaton in Batman. If you're looking for a love interest who can knock down bad guys in her sleep, no one can top Garner and as for the villains, you'll feel Mike Duncan Clarke and Farrell were practically born into their parts.
Swimming Pool:
Swimming Pool is a sophisticated and new kind of movie for our postmodern world in which reality and fantasy become so blurred together. Well, sorry, I'm not on board. Call me old-fashioned but I like stories with coherent beginnings and endings and while I appreciate Ozon's effort to give his films that artistic edge, I felt like I almost wasted a ticket. I say `almost', because if you trim down a few minutes, you have, more or less, a coherent story and up until the end I felt pretty entranced. Set in an appropriately eerie French house, the main characters are a well-known writer and her editor's sexually loose daughter who are forced to temporarily live in it. Despite all the sex, drinking, and violence going on, there's very little going on. Overall, the storyline is very static so it helps that Rampling and Sagnier show so much chemistry as two awkwardly mismatched roommates.
Uptown Girls:
Brittney Murphy and Dakota Fanning star as a very childish 22-year old and a very mature 8-year old in a movie that is pretty flawless. That is if you're a pre-teen and a girl. Everything from the heavy use of peppy teen music, to the shiny lights and purples and pinks decorating the sets and wardrobe to Brittney herself create a mood characteristic of a modern Cinderella story. For the rest of us, it might not be your cup of tea depending on how far removed you are from 12 and your gender, but it still has its moments. Brittney proves herself capable of creating movie magic on screen showing us her childish side, even if she overdoes it a little. As for her counterpart, Fanning holds up ok except that the writers didn't create a very convincing 8-year old. On the whole, the movie is rather intelligent and deals with some weighty material (death of a parent, neglect, etc) that is quite powerful.
Last Samurai:
Being released alongside so many other great war epics,The Last Samurai probably won't get the
recognition it deserves, but that should not detract from its achievements. Set
in 1870s Japan, this is an epic set around a washed-up Civil War veteran played
by Tom Cruise . Whether
you think he's too much of a pretty-boy or not, Cruise can still create magic on
screen, even if he plays the same kind of guy over and over. To refresh your
memory, Cruise starts his films (Rain Man, Jerry MaGuire, etc) as an arrogant
jerk before meeting an inspirational figure, that leads him to a journey of
self-discovery where he changes himself and turns into a true hero. This movie
is the same, but within the context of a war epic, Cruise is just what the
doctor ordered, and
just as Hoffman and Cuba Gooding Jr did exemplary work alongside him, Cruise's
brings out the best in costar Ken Wattanbe, who had an extroadinary presence, in
an already emotionally stirring relationship. The story is beautifully told and
visually beautifully portrayed.
Once Upon a Time in Mexico:
Once Upon a Time in Mexico, ('92 to be exact), a cinematic visionary named Robert Rodriguez made a pretty decent movie with only $7,000. The film, about a guitar playing hero taking up a life of crime after his guitar-playing hand is shot, got him enough attention in Hollywood to attract a bigger budget. Catching the end of this trilogy, it appears he used the cash to find more convincing ways of blowing people up. To call the movie violent is an understatement and there are a couple of moments so graphic that I recommend squeamish people stay away. However, the violence is first-rate here, and Rodriguez' gift of lightly sprinkling clever touches into his action shines through. Set against a masterfully crafted backdrop and a somber Latin-flavored score, Mexico is a shift from his earlier movies in its more epic tone. With a couple exceptions, there is very little character development and in its place is a complex story featuring a complex web of characters on various sides of the good/evil divide. Whether you're able to follow the plot, you'll probably be highly engaged by it and, in contrast to Mexico's tragic predecessors, be elated when the good guys win in the end.
This was essentially my first effort to be a critic. I was out of college for a year and seeking to devote myself to something new and keep myself active. It was through doing these that I eventually got interested in being a critic and in film studies when I went back to college, so it all comes full circle:
Bruce Almighty:
Jim Carrey, who has thoroughly explored bathroom humor and Frank Capraesque drama, finds a very comfortable balance here. The plot: Carey is a newsman in Buffalo whose frustrations over his unmet aspirations to be a news anchor cause him to challenge God himself. God, in the form of Morgan Freeman, accepts his challenge setting up a pretty decent opportunity for some laughs. The choice to put Carrey's character in Buffalo rather than the New York City where most movies are set, seems to resonate in a symbolic sense, as the world Carrey inhabits always seems to be a little off the norm. Aside from Carrey's comedy, and a convincing performance by Morgan Freeman (as convincing as humanly possible, that is, considering he's playing God), I liked this movie because at heart it's very uplifting and speaks great truths about the power of love and `being a miracle.'
Daredevil:
Whether it lives up to the success of its Marvel predecessor Spiderman with whom this superhero shares several parallels, Daredevil is an undeniably solid film. The advantage for Daredevil's appeal is that unlike human spiders, blind people actually do exist and his struggles add a neat human dimension. The title sequence is done in Braille and the special effects, shown from our blind superhero's point of view, are amazing. The well-balanced story is somewhat dark in tone but not depressing, and gives us a good character portrait. What's best about the film, however, is its cast. Ben Affleck, with his do-good persona has superhero written all over him. Affleck isn't physically intimidating but that never stopped Tobey MaGuire in Spiderman or Michael Keaton in Batman. If you're looking for a love interest who can knock down bad guys in her sleep, no one can top Garner and as for the villains, you'll feel Mike Duncan Clarke and Farrell were practically born into their parts.
Swimming Pool:
Swimming Pool is a sophisticated and new kind of movie for our postmodern world in which reality and fantasy become so blurred together. Well, sorry, I'm not on board. Call me old-fashioned but I like stories with coherent beginnings and endings and while I appreciate Ozon's effort to give his films that artistic edge, I felt like I almost wasted a ticket. I say `almost', because if you trim down a few minutes, you have, more or less, a coherent story and up until the end I felt pretty entranced. Set in an appropriately eerie French house, the main characters are a well-known writer and her editor's sexually loose daughter who are forced to temporarily live in it. Despite all the sex, drinking, and violence going on, there's very little going on. Overall, the storyline is very static so it helps that Rampling and Sagnier show so much chemistry as two awkwardly mismatched roommates.
Uptown Girls:
Brittney Murphy and Dakota Fanning star as a very childish 22-year old and a very mature 8-year old in a movie that is pretty flawless. That is if you're a pre-teen and a girl. Everything from the heavy use of peppy teen music, to the shiny lights and purples and pinks decorating the sets and wardrobe to Brittney herself create a mood characteristic of a modern Cinderella story. For the rest of us, it might not be your cup of tea depending on how far removed you are from 12 and your gender, but it still has its moments. Brittney proves herself capable of creating movie magic on screen showing us her childish side, even if she overdoes it a little. As for her counterpart, Fanning holds up ok except that the writers didn't create a very convincing 8-year old. On the whole, the movie is rather intelligent and deals with some weighty material (death of a parent, neglect, etc) that is quite powerful.
Last Samurai:
Being released alongside so many other great war epics,
Once Upon a Time in Mexico:
Once Upon a Time in Mexico, ('92 to be exact), a cinematic visionary named Robert Rodriguez made a pretty decent movie with only $7,000. The film, about a guitar playing hero taking up a life of crime after his guitar-playing hand is shot, got him enough attention in Hollywood to attract a bigger budget. Catching the end of this trilogy, it appears he used the cash to find more convincing ways of blowing people up. To call the movie violent is an understatement and there are a couple of moments so graphic that I recommend squeamish people stay away. However, the violence is first-rate here, and Rodriguez' gift of lightly sprinkling clever touches into his action shines through. Set against a masterfully crafted backdrop and a somber Latin-flavored score, Mexico is a shift from his earlier movies in its more epic tone. With a couple exceptions, there is very little character development and in its place is a complex story featuring a complex web of characters on various sides of the good/evil divide. Whether you're able to follow the plot, you'll probably be highly engaged by it and, in contrast to Mexico's tragic predecessors, be elated when the good guys win in the end.
Tuesday, November 13, 2012
Two pics I have to publish for another blog
This is of absolutely no relevance to anyone who reads this blog. I've been hired to blog a few hours a week for a furniture store in El Monte and Los Angeles, CA and needed a place to store a couple of images.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Favorite Songs for their Lyrics Part VI
Collide, Howie Day-If I heard the line "I'm tangled up in you" from Adam Levine, I'd assume it was some advanced sexual position. In the context of this song it feels metaphorical and thus poetic. Not to say that Howie Day is any more or less sleazy then Levine but he certainly sells a different side of earnest love better. The song sticks out to me because of the artful way it mixes and merges contrasts in the chorus:
"Even the best fall down sometimes. Even the wrong words seem to rhyme. Out of the dark you fill my mind" and it all builds up to an apt description of opposites coming together: the word "collide." The "seem to" in front of "rhyme" also is highly effective as it changes the song entirely: It's as if the narrator is discovering those feelings as he's saying those words.
She Don't Want Nobody Near, Counting Crows-This song is about the duality that sometimes we want to be alone and sometimes we want to be with people.
The song's subject is a woman who likely I can picture as the mysterious neighborhood recluse whose eccentricities are the subject of neighborhood gossip about (to add to that point, the song is written in some slangy dialect laced with double negatives and wrongly used connotations). She doesn't want people in her house because it's crowded but she doesn't want to be alone either so "they just keep pouring in." Throughout the song, her house guests are referred to as "them" and thus portrayed as if they were some form of a house pest. At the very least, other people are something she doesn't understand.
In the final verse, there's a twist that the woman doesn't just have a discomfort around people but a deep-rooted fear of having her sadness rejected by others: "She don't want nobody near cause she don't want anybody to see what she's like when she's down. 'Cause it's a real bad place to be."
3 x 5, John Mayer-One of the non-single songs from his first CD (before he became full of himself), this song is simply about the beauty of the outdoors and scenery. It also has a message to enjoy it for the sake of enjoying it. The narrator feels elation because "Today I finally overcame trying to fit the world inside a picture frame."
This isn't a song that says much (I'm not suggesting a lot of songs do) but it captures a certain feeling very well. I remember in a writing worskhop, one of our exercises was to look at a picture of a seascape overlooking an Irish coastal town and describe it. Even though we largely used the same adjectives ("rustic" "quaint" "placid"), our paragraphs differed wildly. I see this song as John Mayer's version of that exercise and excuse for him to have some fun with it.
For the First Time, The Script-The narrator is someone who's struggling financially and the subject of the song is what I suspect is a platonic female friend who just suffered a broken heart. The repetition of the line "man these times are hard" and the melancholy undertones of the lyrics (i.e. "we're smiling though we're close to tears") suggest that the two of them can't really solve each other's problems. Still, he hopes that the two can ease the pain a little through reconnecting and talking. Not just any talk but a really meaningful one that would keep the two up all night as they drink cheap bottles of wine.
I often wonder with this song if it wouldn't have been more interesting if the subject was a man. The song's subject is probably female because its based on a true story or because logistically the band might be more successful at concerts if all their songs have pseudo-romantic undertones so girls will fawn over them and buy tickets. At the same time, the relationship is platonic and unless he's lying through his teeth and the bottles of wine are a means to make her easier to get in bed, it's clear that he sees her as a platonic friend. If the song is just about friendship, why couldn't the subject be a guy? How often does a guy sing a song to a guy like that? At the same time, I can see the beauty of the song as the fact that she's vulnerable and presumably beautiful but he still wants to develop his friendship with her.
Sara Bairelles, Fairytales and The End of the Innocence, Don Henley-The disconnect between reality and simplistic fictional portrayals of love that dominate our cultural storylines (by which I mean a realistic love story is usually relegated to the Sundance circuit while a Drew Barrymore rom-com opens on 2,000 screens nationwide) is an underexplored theme but one that I hear every once in a while done well in song. Bairelles' short and sweet number shatters the illusion of fairy tales. Cinderella is on the bedroom floor with her dreams shattered while Repunzel concludes she would have cut her hair if she had known men would climb it. Why don't these fairytales play out successfully after the happy ending? Bairelles' answer is "she's always waiting on the next best thing." The subversive suggestion is that it's human nature not to ever settle down into a happy ending.
Henley's song (and my one entry this week before 2000, I'm shamelessly unaware of anything that's not new) also rallies against fairytale mentality with the line "We've been poisoned by these fairytales." He takes it a step further by suggesting what to do when "happily ever after fails." The solution is geographical or metaphorically geographical: "A place we can go still untouched by rain." But that's clearly not much of a solution so he advises his subject to offer up her best defense (reminiscent of the Ben Folds song "Still Fighting It") because it's the end of the innocence.
Click on the lyrics tag for more editions of this series
"Even the best fall down sometimes. Even the wrong words seem to rhyme. Out of the dark you fill my mind" and it all builds up to an apt description of opposites coming together: the word "collide." The "seem to" in front of "rhyme" also is highly effective as it changes the song entirely: It's as if the narrator is discovering those feelings as he's saying those words.
She Don't Want Nobody Near, Counting Crows-This song is about the duality that sometimes we want to be alone and sometimes we want to be with people.
The song's subject is a woman who likely I can picture as the mysterious neighborhood recluse whose eccentricities are the subject of neighborhood gossip about (to add to that point, the song is written in some slangy dialect laced with double negatives and wrongly used connotations). She doesn't want people in her house because it's crowded but she doesn't want to be alone either so "they just keep pouring in." Throughout the song, her house guests are referred to as "them" and thus portrayed as if they were some form of a house pest. At the very least, other people are something she doesn't understand.
In the final verse, there's a twist that the woman doesn't just have a discomfort around people but a deep-rooted fear of having her sadness rejected by others: "She don't want nobody near cause she don't want anybody to see what she's like when she's down. 'Cause it's a real bad place to be."
3 x 5, John Mayer-One of the non-single songs from his first CD (before he became full of himself), this song is simply about the beauty of the outdoors and scenery. It also has a message to enjoy it for the sake of enjoying it. The narrator feels elation because "Today I finally overcame trying to fit the world inside a picture frame."
This isn't a song that says much (I'm not suggesting a lot of songs do) but it captures a certain feeling very well. I remember in a writing worskhop, one of our exercises was to look at a picture of a seascape overlooking an Irish coastal town and describe it. Even though we largely used the same adjectives ("rustic" "quaint" "placid"), our paragraphs differed wildly. I see this song as John Mayer's version of that exercise and excuse for him to have some fun with it.
For the First Time, The Script-The narrator is someone who's struggling financially and the subject of the song is what I suspect is a platonic female friend who just suffered a broken heart. The repetition of the line "man these times are hard" and the melancholy undertones of the lyrics (i.e. "we're smiling though we're close to tears") suggest that the two of them can't really solve each other's problems. Still, he hopes that the two can ease the pain a little through reconnecting and talking. Not just any talk but a really meaningful one that would keep the two up all night as they drink cheap bottles of wine.
I often wonder with this song if it wouldn't have been more interesting if the subject was a man. The song's subject is probably female because its based on a true story or because logistically the band might be more successful at concerts if all their songs have pseudo-romantic undertones so girls will fawn over them and buy tickets. At the same time, the relationship is platonic and unless he's lying through his teeth and the bottles of wine are a means to make her easier to get in bed, it's clear that he sees her as a platonic friend. If the song is just about friendship, why couldn't the subject be a guy? How often does a guy sing a song to a guy like that? At the same time, I can see the beauty of the song as the fact that she's vulnerable and presumably beautiful but he still wants to develop his friendship with her.
Sara Bairelles, Fairytales and The End of the Innocence, Don Henley-The disconnect between reality and simplistic fictional portrayals of love that dominate our cultural storylines (by which I mean a realistic love story is usually relegated to the Sundance circuit while a Drew Barrymore rom-com opens on 2,000 screens nationwide) is an underexplored theme but one that I hear every once in a while done well in song. Bairelles' short and sweet number shatters the illusion of fairy tales. Cinderella is on the bedroom floor with her dreams shattered while Repunzel concludes she would have cut her hair if she had known men would climb it. Why don't these fairytales play out successfully after the happy ending? Bairelles' answer is "she's always waiting on the next best thing." The subversive suggestion is that it's human nature not to ever settle down into a happy ending.
Henley's song (and my one entry this week before 2000, I'm shamelessly unaware of anything that's not new) also rallies against fairytale mentality with the line "We've been poisoned by these fairytales." He takes it a step further by suggesting what to do when "happily ever after fails." The solution is geographical or metaphorically geographical: "A place we can go still untouched by rain." But that's clearly not much of a solution so he advises his subject to offer up her best defense (reminiscent of the Ben Folds song "Still Fighting It") because it's the end of the innocence.
Click on the lyrics tag for more editions of this series
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Parks and Recreation Clips by Me
I'm once again enjoying watching Parks and Recreation this season. As I said in a previous post, I quit the show last year because I found the Tom-Anne pairing a dealbreaker and would even go so far as to say I was empowered with the decision to break from a show if I didn't like its direction.
Nonetheless, aside from Tom and Anne no longer being a couple, I was also pleased to watch Parks and Recreation because I was on the set when it was being shot in Washington.
I met and got a picture with Chris Pratt; was part of a small press corps that photographed Aubrey Plaza and Chris Pratt as they met with the DC mayor; sort of talked to Aubrey; was close enough to hear Chris saying (and improvizing no less) his lines; and was technically an extra in one of the scenes.
It was one of the coolest experiences I've had reporting and a very wonderful turn of events on a day that just 5 1/2 hours earlier I thought would be hopeless (it was about 10:30 am that an e-mail from the DC film office came in announcing Parks and Recreation would be shooting and it was about 4, I finally rendevouzed with the crew and got an article confirmed by two publishers.
Here are two articles I wrote on the incident:
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/film/2012/07/23/highlights-from-fridays-parks-and-recreation-shoot-in-d-c/
http://www.examiner.com/article/parks-and-recreation-dc-mania-kept-alive-throw-twitter-feed
Nonetheless, aside from Tom and Anne no longer being a couple, I was also pleased to watch Parks and Recreation because I was on the set when it was being shot in Washington.
I met and got a picture with Chris Pratt; was part of a small press corps that photographed Aubrey Plaza and Chris Pratt as they met with the DC mayor; sort of talked to Aubrey; was close enough to hear Chris saying (and improvizing no less) his lines; and was technically an extra in one of the scenes.
It was one of the coolest experiences I've had reporting and a very wonderful turn of events on a day that just 5 1/2 hours earlier I thought would be hopeless (it was about 10:30 am that an e-mail from the DC film office came in announcing Parks and Recreation would be shooting and it was about 4, I finally rendevouzed with the crew and got an article confirmed by two publishers.
Here are two articles I wrote on the incident:
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/artsdesk/film/2012/07/23/highlights-from-fridays-parks-and-recreation-shoot-in-d-c/
http://www.examiner.com/article/parks-and-recreation-dc-mania-kept-alive-throw-twitter-feed
Monday, October 08, 2012
Guest Star Update: The Office
It's time for another installment of guest stars. In this version, I will be looking at The Office. The way I do this is by looking at the cast lists from TVrage.com's printable version and writing down the name of every guest star that I recognize. Thus, it's a highly subjective list. An asterisk denotes a recurring role.
The Office:
Amy Adams*, Amy Ryan*, Amy Piitz, Armin Shimerman (Star
Trek: Deep Space Nine), Conan O’Brian, Chip Esten (Whose Line Is it Anyway), Dan
Castellenata (The Simpsons), David Koechner*, Georgia Engel, Idris Elba*, Jim Carrey, Jim
Coleman, Joey Slotnick, Josh Groban, Kathy Bates*, Kevin McHale (Glee), Maura
Tierney, Melora Hardin*, Nancy Walls*, Patrice O’Neal, Ray Romano, Ricky
Gervais, Rob Huebel, Stephen Collins (7th Heaven), Tim Meadows, Timothy Olyphant, Warren
Buffett, Will Arnett, Will Ferrell*, Zoe Jarman (The Mindy Project)
The Office has been relatively low key about guest stars in
comparison to other NBC programs that previously anchored NBC’s Must See
Thursday such Seinfeld, Friends, Will and Grace, and Frasier. Greg Daniel and
Mike Schur have said in interviews that the show’s plan was to veer
away from stunt casting in an effort to preserve the setting. A big name
star, even if they weren’t playing themselves, would break the illusion that
these people lived in a small town disconnected from the nation’s cultural
centers. For instance,
the show was in talks with Carol Burnett to guest star in
the fourth season but likely nixed the idea out of concerns
that she was too famous.*
Perhaps, Conan O’Brian’s anti-climactic non-speaking cameo
is a wink to this notion.
As Michael Scott is commenting on the greatness of New York, he doesn’t
even notice Conan O’Brian walking by although its captured at the edge of the
faux documentary shot.
In spite of this, the show has used bigger names in
recurring roles (Kathy Bates, Amy Ryan, Timothy Olyphant and Irdis Ebra, and
cast James Spader-initially a guest star) and they seemed to reverse course
completely with a guest starring binge in the Season 7 finale with Warren
Buffet, Ray Romano, James Spader, Jim Carrey, and Will Arnett all guesting as
interviewees for the open position. It was also in this season that Will
Ferrell was given a 3-episode arc that many found distracting. A possible
explanation for this was network pressure being worried that the show would
suffer upon Steve Carrell’s departure. Another possible explanation is that
since they were all in the running to take over on the Office, the episode
served as a proverbial test drive.
Before they were famous:
Kevin McHale-Artie on Glee showed us a nice functioning pair
of legs when he played a pizza boy locked in the break room a couple years
before he was cast on Glee.
Zoe Jarman-Jarman just got cast in “The Mindy Project” as a
level-headed receptionist where Mindy works. She played a bubbly young
missionary en route to Mexico
in the “Christening”
Amy Adams-Although she had a scene-stealing role in Catch Me
If You Can, it wasn’t until she got nominated for an Oscar for Junebug (an
independent film few people saw) in early 2006 that she became a known
commodity. Her Oscar nomination occurred on the same week as her last episode
of the Office
Highlights:
Amy Ryan-One of the show’s greatest moments was when Ryan’s
Holly Flax reacted to Michael Scott’s
awkward yoda impression with one of her own. It was then that we knew Holly was
the ying to Michael’s yang and would root for the two of them to get together
for the next three seasons.
Jim Coleman-Probably best known for his role on Heroes,
Coleman plays a state senator who’s importance is inflated by wife Angela but
taken at face value by everyone else. If that weren’t enough, a twist comes
later that season when it’s revealed he’s gay. Being imbued with two
jumping-off points for laughs makes him more well-rounded than some cast
members.
Idris Elba-Elba’s Charles Miner really broke The Office out
of its rut in Season 5 in the way that a great villain can breathe life into a
superhero franchise. The Office’s tone veers toward realism but it skews a
little towards the silly. Miner’s no-nonsense approach created a stark new
contrast to not just Michael Scott but Dunder-Mifflin and the tone of the show
in general. Without so much as cracking a smile, Miner established what seemed
like a reign of terror although he’s probably not too far off from most
workplace bosses.
Josh Groban-Maybe it’s just the novelty of seeing the opera
singer do something different, but Groban was a lot of fun as Andy’s brother
who can outsing him. Stephen Collins (pictured below) from 7th Heaven played a
variation of his dad-of-the-year role with some undertones of parental neglect.
Ricky Gervais-Since the show’s inception as a spin-off of
the legendary British series, the original cast of the Office has been high on
fan’s wish lists but the show has largely strayed away from any crossover
between the universes of Dunder-Mifflin and Slough but in that anomaly of a
seventh season, Gervais’ David Brent had a chance meeting with his American expy
in the show’s cold open. It was largely inconsequential and blatantly
pandering, but an undeniably fun couple of minutes.
Blink and you miss it:
Andy Daly-Ben Franklin in the bachelor party episode was
played by stand-up comedian and Mad TV alum Andy Daly. In real life, Daly is a
history buff and enjoyed improvising the scene with Rainn Wilson.
Patrice O’Neal-The late great comedian appeared as one of
Daryl’s warehouse workers on three occasions.This is ironic because I actually thought that Daryl was played by Patrice O'Neal for a short while before Craig Robinson broke out in Judd Apatow's films.
Kevin McHale-As previously mentioned, Kevin McHale played the pizza delivery boy with an attitude who found himself locked in the Dunder-Mifflin conference room when he ticked off Michael Scott.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

